Foreign adoption seems like the perfect solution to a heartbreaking imbalance: Poor countries have babies in need of homes, and rich countries have homes in need of babies. Unfortunately, those little orphaned bundles of joy may not be orphans at all.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (2)
As international adoptions have flourished, so has evidence that babies in many countries are being systematically bought, coerced, and stolen away from their birth families. Nearly half the 40 countries listed by the U.S. State Department as the top sources for international adoption over the past 15 years—places such as Belarus, Brazil, Ethiopia, Honduras, Peru, and Romania—have at least temporarily halted adoptions or been prevented from sending children to the United States because of serious concerns about corruption and kidnapping. And yet when a country is closed due to corruption, many adoption agencies simply transfer their clients’ hopes to the next “hot” country. That country abruptly experiences a spike in infants and toddlers adopted overseas—until it too is forced to shut its doors.
Neither Angelina Jolie's daughter Zahara nor Madonna's son David Banda was an orphan. Both have a surviving parent. The pattern of hot countries for adoptions is at least as old as the Viet Nam War itself, or even WWII when there were some legitimate war orphans to be found in Europe.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



